Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was manufactured 7 years prior to the TG-4 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-520 grades versus the TG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-4
E-520 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-520
TG-4 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 80 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-4
E-520 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-520 versus the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee33f/ee33fa10f364e012e39f808a9eeba25fe9a8149c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and TG-4 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a1c3/9a1c3eefb0bd81651c94aff88aa5298878508514" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and TG-4.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-4 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29017/290175431b583fc11eb0ca822a9804553b983677" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c922/4c922e6b6ee9914e425b064bb74173a34b13761b" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 380 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $379 |