Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the FS15 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FS15 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-520 was manufactured 4 months earlier than the FS15 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-520 scores versus the FS15 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FS15
| E-520 | FS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus E-520
| FS15 | E-520 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FS15
| E-520 | FS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2008 | January 2009 | Same age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 comes with outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic FS15 has measurements of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-520 against the FS15.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FS15 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The photograph below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and FS15.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FS15 will render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2008-08-20 | 2009-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 136g (0.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $180 |