Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic FX48, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the FX48 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 5 months before the FX48 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-520 scores vs the FX48 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FX48
E-520 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-520
FX48 | E-520 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX48
E-520 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2008 | ![]() | January 2009 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has got outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic FX48 has measurements of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic FX48 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 compared to the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27aad/27aad5e24886572ea84253f69c8472372e1f4de1" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FX48 is 68 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d32/f5d32d03618a84d7afee09e310696d4328b9074c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and FX48.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX48 will deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6bdc/f6bdc94b203d3ef417c5965d9bc74e8ff30a063a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70a1c/70a1c13565db9da56ded6ebd54cae3016cafd8f6" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $325 |