Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-520 was unveiled 21 months earlier than the FX75 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-520 scores vs the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FX75
| E-520 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-520
| FX75 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 | August 2008 | More recent by 21 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75
| E-520 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 against the FX75.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FX75 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FX75.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will give extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 165g (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $400 | $139 |