Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-520 was unveiled 21 months earlier than the FX75 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-520 scores vs the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FX75

 E-520 FX75 
Manually focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-520

 FX75 E-520 
LaunchedJune 2010August 2008More recent by 21 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75

 E-520 FX75 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display measurement
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

See the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 against the FX75.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FX75 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FX75.

Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will give extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FX75 Portrait photography highlights
59
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-520
Street photography with Panasonic FX75
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
62
image stabilization (Optical)
has touch focus
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography features
Panasonic FX75 Sports photography features
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery pack (650 shots)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low MP (10MP)
39
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Travel photography camera
52
good battery pack (650 per charge)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
67
has touch focus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FX75 Landscape photography factors
58
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (650 CIPA)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
37
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FX75 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
31
really wide (24mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Alternative name - Lumix DMC-FX70
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2008-08-20 2010-06-01
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 lbs) 165g (0.36 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $400 $139