Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d922/3d92276b7d9e74705fc702679568ccbb33cc2193" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front"
90 Imaging
48 Features
48 Overall
48
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GF2
- Successor is Panasonic GF5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the GF3 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 4 years before the GF3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GF3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-520 scores against the GF3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic GF3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic GF3
E-520 | GF3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Olympus E-520
GF3 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 36 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3
E-520 | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 comes with physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF3 has specifications of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the GF3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da857/da857a8a0352006b0104159c3199fd24a82e5430" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and GF3 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1856a/1856a132b152a495b36aa15e7706671742f74380" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and GF3.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Panasonic GF3 to give you extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eade/3eadeac084f338a5ae80cde4eacc39648e9b4147" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/655c8/655c824e8ea9e27ed816f762c5e2a5baf30e1e2c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2011-08-11 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 264 gr (0.58 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 20.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 548 | 459 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 300 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $360 |