Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
48
Features
48
Overall
48

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic GF3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 160 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
  • Introduced August 2011
  • Old Model is Panasonic GF2
  • Successor is Panasonic GF5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Overview

Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the GF3 (12MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-520 was brought out 4 years before the GF3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GF3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-520 scores against the GF3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic GF3

 E-520 GF3 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Olympus E-520

 GF3 E-520 
IntroducedAugust 2011August 2008More modern by 36 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3

 E-520 GF3 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 comes with physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF3 has specifications of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the GF3.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and GF3 is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and GF3.

As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Panasonic GF3 to give you extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Panasonic GF3
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
55
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography factors
Panasonic GF3 Street photography factors
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
70
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts focus by touch
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-520
Sports photography with Panasonic GF3
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great battery (650 per charge)
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery (300 shots)
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic GF3 as a Travel photography camera
52
great battery (650 per charge)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
58
boasts focus by touch
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery (300 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Panasonic GF3
58
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
great battery (650 per charge)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10MP)
missing Timelapse mode
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging information
Panasonic GF3 Vlogging information
9
lack of video recording
32
touchscreen functionality
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
lack of microphone support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GF3
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2008-08-20 2011-08-11
Physical type Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 160
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 gr (1.22 pounds) 264 gr (0.58 pounds)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 50
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 20.6
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 10.1
DXO Low light score 548 459
Other
Battery life 650 photos 300 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $400 $360