Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a81b/6a81b74be2fc2f5b005db0ba199900d1cad3b423" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was unveiled 4 years later than the ZS1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PM2 grades vs the ZS1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Panasonic ZS1
E-PM2 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-PM2
ZS1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Panasonic ZS1
E-PM2 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 enjoys outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS1 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PM2 vs the ZS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/889f1/889f13fb35f48c748e78e3d1f921ad66681e9d48" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and ZS1 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0adb1/0adb10705e82bec16243bc0b67ae08d5a9133e99" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and ZS1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d765/8d7655323e152da91bad9683781c479d4ff09e89" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fd73/0fd73b1658362b5094dfe0c71ec7a11b0bddeec9" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-05-21 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 229 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $448 | $0 |