Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ffc/43ffc5718422e6e3eca344eb7e4a55ae79707d20" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 front"
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 189g - 98 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FT1
- Replacement is Panasonic TS2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic TS1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the TS1 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TS1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was manufactured 5 months before the TS1 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic TS1 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-520 scores versus the TS1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic TS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic TS1
E-520 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS1 over the Olympus E-520
TS1 | E-520 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic TS1
E-520 | TS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2008 | ![]() | January 2009 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 enjoys outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic TS1 has proportions of 98mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic TS1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 against the TS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09616/096161d619ede274740157049100ed45bbb6e127" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and TS1 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7b70/a7b7077816f1a8d882e314b1c8315c959f3aeb8d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The picture here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TS1.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic TS1 will produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d69d3/d69d36564a90d12e631e41ff4198db055afcc780" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca1f4/ca1f480ee7d18649a67cfdf73a302b7479b1921f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FT1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 189g (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 63 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $400 | $380 |