Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5708/e57084ceb52f3aee5776564caad37a3d062fbbca" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front"
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 5 years prior to the ZS25 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-520 matches up versus the ZS25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS25
E-520 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-520
ZS25 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 53 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS25
E-520 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 features outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS25 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 against the ZS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf04e/bf04e8b4f5b8f857bb45e0a4b0aa703e4a2db36c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and ZS25 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9904a/9904a033242b1f5d6ba5520fc9fe0d179b914571" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and ZS25.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS25 will result in more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8d3e/e8d3e6e0dc02154be89df2dd5711727b32fe7023" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be1bc/be1bce4421cf085f467c9e98589a63f47b880d25" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 260 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $300 |