Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f723e/f723e81453526a233f505df0ddb061f94542e2ef" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 front"
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS35
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS40, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS40 (18MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS40 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-520 was revealed 6 years earlier than the ZS40 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-520 scores vs the ZS40 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS40
E-520 | ZS40 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus E-520
ZS40 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 65 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS40
E-520 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 comes with outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS40 has sizing of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS40 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-520 and the ZS40.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4f26/f4f26a3653e74619349de12ab79f4fd96e572f04" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS40 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efbdb/efbdbec7cf2480e3426d12fa38a91a783b8c4214" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and ZS40.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS40 will produce extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e391a/e391acc757b3de124ece4bc956faeb0d5b9ef328" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f65b/1f65b2fd1919db079dc4792fbc6d498b0daededc" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 pounds) | 240g (0.53 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 300 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $400 | $450 |