Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c34/36c348531fded57bb8232a7d8dbfc92d463e3677" alt="Pentax K-5 front Pentax K-5 front"
60 Imaging
56 Features
82 Overall
66
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 740g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Announced December 2010
- Superseded the Pentax K-7
- Updated by Pentax K-5 IIs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax K-5, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and K-5 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and K-5 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 3 years prior to the K-5 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax K-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-520 matches up versus the K-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Pentax K-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax K-5
E-520 | K-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 over the Olympus E-520
K-5 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2010 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 28 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-5
E-520 | K-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Pentax K-5 has measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") along with a weight of 740 grams (1.63 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax K-5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-520 vs the K-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a85d5/a85d5da17f97a5695ad507fa73a1afd49f27dcfe" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and K-5 is 68 and 60 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fc1b/8fc1b134950cc93dbfadfc973fc3c3cfb3a65e11" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and K-5.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-5 will offer you extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9c13/e9c137de752b0e9ffaba0871620074ccf0a8b9ff" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ebab/5ebabf30964c823453dfb04e8a6dd0a8e1e612ae" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-5 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-5 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2010-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 424 (25, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 740g (1.63 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | 548 | 1162 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 980 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $400 | $800 |