Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-520 was introduced 24 months prior to the CX4 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-520 scores against the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Ricoh CX4
| E-520 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-520
| CX4 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 | August 2008 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh CX4
| E-520 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 has got outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 against the CX4.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and CX4 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The photograph here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and CX4.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The E-520 contains the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $400 | $211 |