Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and GX-1L (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 2 years after the GX-1L which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-520 grades against the GX-1L with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Samsung GX-1L. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Samsung GX-1L
E-520 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2008 | ![]() | February 2006 | Newer by 31 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Olympus E-520
GX-1L | E-520 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Samsung GX-1L
E-520 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 compared to the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c445c/c445c385a87c1279948be1597316d090fe921a97" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and GX-1L is 68 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a39c3/a39c3cd4844e1259e86f3dc9a06402fff215b78e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and GX-1L.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-520 will provide greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-520 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e5b/e9e5bf647c0212be870d479d17423d9356e21442" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b84cd/b84cd926924c3d01e5952f35035c5e8eed934d4e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Samsung GX-1L |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2006-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Total lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 570 grams (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $400 | $0 |