Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Overview

Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-520 and Sony T900, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-520 was brought out 6 months prior to the T900 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-520 scores versus the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony T900

 E-520 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-520

 T900 E-520 
Display size3.5"2.7"Larger display (+0.8")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony T900

 E-520 T900 
LaunchedAugust 2008February 2009Same age
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 offers external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-520 versus the T900.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and T900 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and T900.

As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sony T900 will produce greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Sony T900
58
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
27
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
Sony T900 Street photography highlights
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography details
Sony T900 Sports photography details
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
better than average battery (650 CIPA)
has phase detect AF
max fps low (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10MP)
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Sony T900 as a Travel photography camera
52
better than average battery (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low resolution (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Sony T900
57
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (650 CIPA)
tiny screen (2.7")
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse mode
36
manual focus
screen larger than average (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-520
Vlogging with Sony T900
9
no video
28
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony T900
 Olympus E-520Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-520 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2008-08-20 2009-02-17
Body design Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 pounds) 143 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $400 $300