Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-520 and Sony W350, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and W350 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and W350 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-520 was announced 16 months earlier than the W350 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-520 grades vs the W350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony W350
| E-520 | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus E-520
| W350 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | August 2008 | More modern by 16 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony W350
| E-520 | W350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 provides physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 and Sony W350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-520 vs the W350.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and W350 is 68 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and W350.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony W350 will offer you more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W350 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $400 | $200 |