Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64563/645636d093b648e451fa5c111a76205fe71c31e6" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 front"
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 122g - 93 x 52 x 23mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-520 versus Sony W830, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and W830 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and W830 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-520 was released 6 years earlier than the W830 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W830 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-520 scores vs the W830 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Sony W830 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony W830
E-520 | W830 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony W830 over the Olympus E-520
W830 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 65 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony W830
E-520 | W830 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony W830 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 versus Sony W830 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-520 versus the W830.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da52a/da52a2e3bdb638a4af6350d4ada80228212759d4" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and W830 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b78f0/b78f0138ec3636b4e632d3552aabc0704f62736d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and W830.
Plainly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony W830 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/439cd/439cd799788b879530450c8539268b8a68fddb9f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dba21/dba21b32c2b59a57d0dfa51c5bf84dddc7d90216" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Sony W830 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5152 x 3864 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.3 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.80 m (with ISO auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 93 x 52 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $400 | $128 |