Clicky

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-600 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Olympus E-600
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Announced August 2009
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-600 was brought out 4 months before the Tough-3000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-600 matches up against the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 E-600 Tough-3000 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-600

 Tough-3000 E-600 

Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus Tough-3000

 E-600 Tough-3000 
IntroducedAugust 2009January 2010Similar generation
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display sizing
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-600 and the Tough-3000.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and Tough-3000 is 71 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and Tough-3000.

To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The E-600 comes with the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF easier.

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-600
Portrait photography with Olympus Tough-3000
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-600 Street photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography factors
76
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-600 Sports photography info
Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography info
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery (500 shots)
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Travel photography camera
53
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery (500 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
61
weather proof
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-600 Landscape photography info
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography info
53
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery (500 per charge)
no Time Lapse recording
35
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-600 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Vlogging camera
18
lack of video recording
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-600 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-600 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Olympus E-600Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-600 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also called as - mju Tough 3000
Type Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2009-08-30 2010-01-07
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 7 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range - 2cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 515 grams (1.14 lb) 159 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 541 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $0 $0