Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8827b/8827bce566ff49a9ec59943239c0e381145b1f2b" alt="Olympus E-600 front Olympus E-600 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-870, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-600 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-600 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-600 was unveiled 7 years prior to the TG-870 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-600 matches up vs the TG-870 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus TG-870
E-600 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-600
TG-870 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 77 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-870
E-600 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-600 has outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-600 and Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-600 and the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d6d7/4d6d79a21e260d63515291347495b8c5df67f64c" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and TG-870 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a042/0a042c2033fb26dab0baa9daabee598a9fbd5ddb" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The visual here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and TG-870.
All in all, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-600 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-870 will result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-600 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c81d/8c81d6980c48cdf635d8d3b24a9f576286a1bc43" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08194/0819473d5f8454d3498cb8e2a42669a315dab9ce" alt="Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-08-30 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $280 |