Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus XZ-10, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-600 was announced 4 years prior to the XZ-10 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-600 scores vs the XZ-10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-600 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-600
XZ-10 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | August 2009 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Olympus XZ-10
E-600 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-600 provides outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-600 versus Olympus XZ-10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-600 vs the XZ-10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and XZ-10 is 71 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-600 and XZ-10.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-600 features the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-600 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-08-30 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $428 |