Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-600 was manufactured 17 months before the FX78 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-600 scores versus the FX78 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-600 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Panasonic FX78
E-600 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-600
FX78 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | August 2009 | More recent by 17 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Panasonic FX78
E-600 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-600 has outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-600 compared to the FX78.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and FX78 is 71 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-600 and FX78.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same MP but different sensor measurements. The E-600 features the larger sensor which should make achieving bokeh easier. The older E-600 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 gr (1.14 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 200 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $210 |