Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-600 versus Ricoh CX4, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty similar but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-600 was announced 11 months prior to the CX4 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-600 scores vs the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 and Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Ricoh CX4
E-600 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-600
CX4 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | August 2009 | More recent by 11 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Ricoh CX4
E-600 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-600 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-600 versus Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-600 versus the CX4.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and CX4 is 71 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and CX4.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-600 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-600 will offer you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-600 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Ricoh CX4 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $211 |