Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-600 and Samsung HZ25W, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is relatively close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-600 was introduced 10 months earlier than the HZ25W which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-600 matches up vs the HZ25W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Samsung HZ25W. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Samsung HZ25W
E-600 | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-600
HZ25W | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2010 | August 2009 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Samsung HZ25W
E-600 | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-600 features outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-600 and Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-600 against the HZ25W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-600 and HZ25W is 71 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-600 and HZ25W.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit different sensor sizing. The E-600 contains the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-600 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus E-600 | Samsung HZ25W |
Also called | - | WB5000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-08-30 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 515g (1.14 lbs) | 428g (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $350 |