Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
66 Imaging
50 Features
38 Overall
45
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-600 and Sony A200, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is pretty close but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-600 was introduced 14 months after the A200 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-600 matches up vs the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-600 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony A200
| E-600 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2009 |  | July 2008 | More modern by 14 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-600
| A200 | E-600 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony A200
| E-600 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-600 features external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-600 and Sony A200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-600 vs the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-600 and A200 is 71 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and A200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-600 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-600 will result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-600 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-600 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus E-600 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-600 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-08-30 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 541 | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $100 |
