Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 515g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-600 (12MP) and the W620 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-600 (Four Thirds) and W620 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-600 was introduced 3 years before the W620 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-600 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W620 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-600 matches up vs the W620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-600 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-600 Gallery & Sony W620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-600 over the Sony W620
E-600 | W620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W620 over the Olympus E-600
W620 | E-600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 28 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-600 and Sony W620
E-600 | W620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-600 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 515 grams (1.14 lbs) while the Sony W620 has dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-600 vs the W620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-600 and W620 is 71 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The pic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-600 and W620.
All in all, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-600 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony W620 will produce more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-600 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-600 vs Sony W620 Specifications
Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-600 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-08-30 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 515 grams (1.14 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 541 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 220 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $102 |