Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was announced 12 months before the XZ-1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the Tough-3000 scores against the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus XZ-1
Tough-3000 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
XZ-1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus XZ-1
Tough-3000 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 against the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e71a/9e71a9efcf12379bf2465e1964721c149e17eb77" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05882/05882d3552938f77be09e044bffba92cfd3cc66c" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The graphic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and XZ-1.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus Tough-3000 will produce more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/626b5/626b5868ef42544e3415f779092980d520e29f39" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/502ed/502edd8ec694f23e388857673040c4e2735aaa1e" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $567 |