Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df626/df626bef912175bc325f643acd7fe689445e4684" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 front"
96 Imaging
38 Features
23 Overall
32
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 121g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic F5, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the F5 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and F5 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-620 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the F5 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic F5 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-620 grades vs the F5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic F5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic F5
E-620 | F5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic F5 over the Olympus E-620
F5 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 42 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic F5
E-620 | F5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic F5 has sizing of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic F5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-620 against the F5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/315ac/315ac778fb47634bf829f7d46b93c3dda499bafb" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and F5 is 71 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e452e/e452e3664525d0466a65d0a0e14087d068d3c8c0" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and F5.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic F5 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/595ab/595aba555c8c2e46d8cf9bc69a745989ad3989ff" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30ca9/30ca9edb70ba6e27aef96a78af837f2754b5e525" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic F5 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 250 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $799 | $100 |