Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FS42, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was launched 3 months after the FS42 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-620 scores versus the FS42 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FS42
E-620 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-620
FS42 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FS42
E-620 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | April 2009 | Similar generation | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 provides outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FS42 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-620 vs the FS42.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and FS42 is 71 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and FS42.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-620 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $580 |