Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
81 Imaging
49 Features
57 Overall
52
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 124 x 90 x 45mm
- Revealed July 2009
- New Model is Panasonic GH2
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic GH1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the GH1 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-620 was introduced around the same time to the GH1 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GH1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-620 scores versus the GH1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic GH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic GH1
E-620 | GH1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH1 over the Olympus E-620
GH1 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic GH1
E-620 | GH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | July 2009 | Same age | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GH1 has dimensions of 124mm x 90mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") having a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic GH1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-620 against the GH1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and GH1 is 71 and 81 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and GH1.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you have to consider the age of the cameras into account.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic GH1 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2009-07-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 18.89 x 14.48mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 273.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 10.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 385 grams (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 124 x 90 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 21.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | 536 | 772 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 320 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $799 | $949 |