Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
69 Imaging
63 Features
70 Overall
65
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 558g - 121 x 93 x 70mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Refreshed by Pentax K-S2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Olympus E-620 and Pentax K-S1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and K-S1 (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and K-S1 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-620 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the K-S1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax K-S1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-620 matches up against the K-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Pentax K-S1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Pentax K-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Pentax K-S1
| E-620 | K-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S1 over the Olympus E-620
| K-S1 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 62 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Pentax K-S1
| E-620 | K-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-S1 has dimensions of 121mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 558 grams (1.23 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 and Pentax K-S1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-620 against the K-S1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and K-S1 is 71 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and K-S1.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-620 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Pentax K-S1 will deliver greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax K-S1 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Pentax K-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-620 | Pentax K-S1 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2014-08-27 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Prime MII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Available lenses | 45 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 5.4 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, auto + redeye, on, on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 558 grams (1.23 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 121 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 23.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 13.0 |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | 1061 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 410 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $799 | $339 |