Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Launched January 2016
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Revealed February 2019
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic S1R, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and S1R (47MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and S1R (Full frame) provide different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe PEN-F was released 4 years prior to the S1R and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic S1R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the PEN-F grades against the S1R with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN-F & Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Panasonic S1R
PEN-F | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Olympus PEN-F
S1R | PEN-F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2019 | January 2016 | More recent by 36 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 2100k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1063k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic S1R
PEN-F | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus PEN-F offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Panasonic S1R has dimensions of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") and a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Check the Olympus PEN-F and Panasonic S1R in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the PEN-F vs the S1R.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and S1R is 84 and 54 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The graphic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the PEN-F and S1R.
All in all, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The PEN-F due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Panasonic S1R will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 27MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older PEN-F is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-01-27 | 2019-02-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 47MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 8000 x 6000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Number of lenses | 107 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 5,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427g (0.94 lbs) | 1020g (2.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 74 | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | 894 | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 360 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Pricing at release | $1,000 | $3,698 |