Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced January 2008
- New Model is Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-620 was manufactured 18 months after the A300 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-620 grades against the A300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A300
| E-620 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 | January 2008 | Newer by 18 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-620
| A300 | E-620 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300
| E-620 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 versus the A300.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and A300 is 71 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The pic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and A300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-620 will produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-620 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 632g (1.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $799 | $0 |