Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced January 2008
- New Model is Sony A330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-620 was manufactured 18 months after the A300 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-620 grades against the A300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A300
| E-620 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 | January 2008 | Newer by 18 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-620
| A300 | E-620 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300
| E-620 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 versus the A300.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and A300 is 71 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The pic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and A300.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-620 will produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-620 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 632g (1.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $799 | $0 |