Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Announced July 2009
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced January 2008
  • New Model is Sony A330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-620 was manufactured 18 months after the A300 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-620 grades against the A300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A300

 E-620 A300 
AnnouncedJuly 2009January 2008Newer by 18 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-620

 A300 E-620 

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300

 E-620 A300 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Sony A300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 versus the A300.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and A300 is 71 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The pic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and A300.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-620 will produce more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-620 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography advice
Sony A300 Portrait photography advice
60
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Street photography camera
Sony A300 as a Street photography camera
76
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
74
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A300 as a Sports photography camera
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery life (500 per charge)
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low MP (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography info
Sony A300 Travel photography info
53
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery life (500 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
45
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A300 as a Landscape photography camera
53
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery life (500 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
57
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
low MP (10MP)
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Sony A300
18
lack of video recording
9
no video recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony A300
 Olympus E-620Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-620 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2009-07-06 2008-01-30
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 7 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500g (1.10 lbs) 632g (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 64
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 11.4
DXO Low light score 536 538
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $799 $0