Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Replaced the Sony A6000
  • Refreshed by Sony A6500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-620 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the A6300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-620 scores against the A6300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A6300

 E-620 A6300 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-620

 A6300 E-620 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016July 2009Fresher by 80 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A6300

 E-620 A6300 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 features external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has sizing of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 against the A6300.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and A6300 is 71 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The photograph below should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and A6300.

As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A6300 will render extra detail having an extra 12MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography information
Sony A6300 Portrait photography information
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
80
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-620
Street photography with Sony A6300
76
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
79
screen tilts up and down
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography features
Sony A6300 Sports photography features
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
75
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography highlights
Sony A6300 Travel photography highlights
53
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Time Lapse function
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
76
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
flash built-in
does not have selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A6300 Landscape photography highlights
53
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent sized screen (3")
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Sony A6300
18
can't shoot video
35
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have external mic jack
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony A6300
 Olympus E-620Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-620 Sony Alpha a6300
Class Entry-Level DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-07-06 2016-02-03
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 51200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 7 425
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 gr (1.10 lbs) 404 gr (0.89 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 85
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 13.7
DXO Low light score 536 1437
Other
Battery life 500 shots 400 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $799 $889