Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-620 and Sony W320, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-620 was introduced 6 months prior to the W320 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-620 grades versus the W320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony W320

 E-620 W320 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-620

 W320 E-620 

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony W320

 E-620 W320 
ReleasedJuly 2009January 2010Same generation
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display size
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 enjoys external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 and Sony W320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 compared to the W320.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and W320 is 71 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and W320.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W320 will render extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography advice
Sony W320 Portrait photography advice
60
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
28
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Street photography camera
Sony W320 as a Street photography camera
76
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
49
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography info
Sony W320 Sports photography info
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery pack (500 shots)
26
MP count decent (14MP)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-620
Travel photography with Sony W320
53
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
66
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography factors
Sony W320 Landscape photography factors
53
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
33
rather wide (26mm)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Sony W320
18
no video
26
rather wide (26mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony W320
 Olympus E-620Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-620 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Type Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-07-06 2010-01-07
Body design Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 7 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500g (1.10 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $799 $269