Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
94 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 34-238mm (F3.6-5.6) lens
- 179g - 100 x 57 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-620 and Sony W370, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the W370 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and W370 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was introduced 6 months prior to the W370 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W370 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-620 scores against the W370 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Sony W370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony W370
| E-620 | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W370 over the Olympus E-620
| W370 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony W370
| E-620 | W370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 | January 2010 | Similar generation | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 offers outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony W370 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 and Sony W370 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-620 and the W370.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and W370 is 71 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and W370.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony W370 will resolve extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W370 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W370 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 34-238mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.6-5.6 |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 100 x 57 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $799 | $230 |