Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Refreshed by Sony A68
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-620 was manufactured 3 years prior to the A65 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-620 scores versus the A65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A65
E-620 | A65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-620
A65 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A65
E-620 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 and Sony A65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-620 vs the A65.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and A65 is 71 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The visual below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and A65.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A65 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 622g (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 536 | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 560 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $799 | $700 |