Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and DV150F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FE-25 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the DV150F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the FE-25 scores versus the DV150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 and Samsung DV150F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-25 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Samsung DV150F
| FE-25 | DV150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus FE-25
| DV150F | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Samsung DV150F
| FE-25 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung DV150F has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-25 against the DV150F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and DV150F is 98 and 96 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-25 and DV150F.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung DV150F to offer more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-25 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Samsung DV150F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $15 | $150 |