Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh G700SE: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Cameras for Distinctive Use Cases

Choosing a compact camera today involves balancing image quality, ruggedness, and feature sets tailored to your photography style. In this comparison, I’m putting two unique cameras through the lens - pun intended - that represent different ultracompact segments but share the common 12MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor baseline: the Olympus FE-3010 (2009) and the Ricoh G700SE (2010). Although released more than a decade ago, examining these models together illustrates how ultracompacts addressed portability and environmental durability in their own ways.

Drawing from hands-on testing experience with thousands of cameras, plus rigorous assessment of each specification and performance dimension, I’ll provide an authoritative, user-focused comparison across major photography genres, technical features, and real-world usability. Whether you’re a casual enthusiast, traveler, or a professional seeking a rugged backup, this analysis will disentangle their strengths and limitations.

Compact vs. Rugged: Design and Handling Fundamentals

First impressions matter, especially with small cameras designed for versatility or tough conditions.

• Olympus FE-3010 is an ultracompact, lightweight camera weighing just 108 grams with sleek dimensions (93x56x18 mm). Its minimalist, slim profile is ideal for true pocket portability and street photography where discretion is key. The fixed lens with a 36-108mm (35mm equivalent) zoom caters to simple snapshots.

• Ricoh G700SE, by contrast, is built for durability and heavy use. Weighing nearly 307 grams and considerably chunkier (117x68x32 mm), this waterproof compact withstands environmental hazards and shocks. Its robust body feels secure in hand but sacrifices some portability.

Ergonomically, Olympus leans into simplicity, but its small size means controls are limited and menu navigation can be fiddly if you have larger hands. Ricoh offers physical manual focus controls - a rarity in ultracompacts - and a beefier grip area, making it more practical for outdoor and industrial applications.

Control Layout and User Interface

Both cameras have fixed LCDs (no articulating or touchscreen panels), but the Ricoh’s slightly larger 3-inch, 920k-dot screen is a clear advantage over the Olympus’s modest 2.7-inch, 230k-dot display.

Neither features an electronic viewfinder (EVF), so live view on the back screen is your only real-time framing method. This makes screen brightness, resolution, and viewing angles important in bright outdoor conditions - here the Ricoh is superior.

The Olympus lacks dedicated buttons for manual controls; it also doesn’t support manual exposure or shutter/aperture priority modes. Ricoh allows manual focus adjustment and has a self-timer option with flexible timing (2 or 10 seconds), while Olympus offers a fixed 12-second timer.

Both cameras rely on fixed lens zoom control rings/buttons, but Ricoh’s greater focal range (28-140 mm equivalent) offers more creative flexibility.

Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensors, Big Questions

Both the Olympus FE-3010 and Ricoh G700SE sport similar 12MP 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, a common size in compact cameras of their era. While CCDs typically render pleasing color and less noise at base ISOs, their dynamic range and high ISO performance tend to lag behind newer CMOS sensors.

• Sensor Size & Resolution: Both are matched closely, with a slight edge in sensor area to the Ricoh (28.07 mm² vs 27.72 mm²), but this difference is negligible in practice.

• Native ISO Ranges: Olympus caps at ISO 1600, while Ricoh extends up to 3200. However, beware that noise at these higher ISO values remains substantial due to sensor limitations.

• Lenses: Olympus offers a 3x zoom from 36-108mm at f/3.1-5.9 max aperture; Ricoh covers 28-140mm with f/3.5-5.5. The wider angle on Ricoh matters greatly for landscapes and interiors.

For portrait photographers, the aperture range means neither camera delivers exceptionally shallow depth of field or extreme bokeh. However, both feature antialiasing filters that help reduce moiré and aliasing artifacts for cleaner midsize prints.

The lack of RAW support on both models limits post-processing flexibility dramatically - JPEG is your only option. In intensive editing workflows common for professionals, this is a dealbreaker.

Live View and User Experience

In practice, the Ricoh’s screen offers far better visibility and detail monitoring, which proved quite helpful during real-world testing in daylight.

Olympus’s screen severely limits manual focus and framing precision, especially in harsh lighting. Both lack touchscreens, which is an expected limitation given their vintage.

Neither camera offers a viewfinder, so handholding stability is essential for sharp captures. Olympus compensates slightly with digital image stabilization, while Ricoh lacks IS but benefits from a rugged body that encourages deliberate framing.

Olympus FE 3010 front Olympus FE 3010 screen back Ricoh G700SE front Ricoh G700SE screen back

Photography Disciplines Under the Microscope

Let’s take a detailed look at how each camera performs across specific photography genres based on my hands-on tests, alongside technical specifications and real-world usage insights.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh Challenges

• Olympus FE-3010 delivers decent skin tone rendition for natural indoor lighting but struggles in lower-light scenarios due to restricted aperture and ISO ceiling. The digital stabilization helps avoid slight blurriness but can’t replace optically smooth bokeh. Facial recognition autofocus assists, but active eye detection is missing.

• Ricoh G700SE lacks face or eye detection autofocus, requiring more manual intervention. That said, it offers macro focusing down to 1cm, enabling tight face or eye close-ups rarely possible on ultracompacts. Skin tones appear neutral but sometimes washed out under fluorescent indoor lighting.

Bottom line: For casual portraits, Olympus works fine with its simpler autofocus and stabilization. Ricoh’s macro capability appeals to portrait artists seeking extreme close-ups but requires patience to focus precisely.

Landscape Photography: Wide Perspective and Dynamic Range

Ricoh pulls ahead thanks to:

• The wider 28mm equivalent lens end is invaluable for landscapes.
• Slightly higher sensor resolution and aperture.
• Higher max ISO, though noisy.
• Built-in environmental sealing including waterproofing, allowing shoot-in-the-rain or wet conditions without worry.

Olympus’s 36mm wide isn’t as flexible for explorations, and the ultracompact body lacks the rugged sealing for strict outdoor endurance.

Dynamic range test comparisons indicate both sensors handle bright and dark scene extremes modestly but tend to clip highlights under harsh sunlight. Expect medium image quality for large prints.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Rate Constraints

Neither camera is designed specifically for fast-action sports or wildlife photography:

• Both lack continuous autofocus tracking and phase detection AF technologies.
• Burst shooting modes are absent or severely restricted; Olympus doesn’t support continuous shooting at all.
• Shutter speeds max out at 1/2000 on Olympus and 1/1500 on Ricoh - adequate but not optimized for action freezing.

Ricoh’s manual focus capability allows precise control for macro or landscape, but autofocus speed remains slow in dim light. Both cameras’ relatively slow autofocus hunting make capturing fast wildlife challenging.

Verdict: Both mostly unsuitable for professional wildlife/sports, but Ricoh’s ruggedness allows close-up shooting in extreme environments safer than Olympus.

Street Photography: Discretion and Portability

Olympus shines here:

• Featherweight and slim design fits in any pocket unnoticed.
• Quiet operation with no mechanical zoom noises.
• Fast access to digital stabilization reduces hand shake in low light.

Ricoh’s bulk and loud shutter make it less than ideal for candid street shooting, plus it stands out due to its rugged appearance.

Macro Photography: Getting Close and Precise

Ricoh beats Olympus clearly in macro capability:

• Macro focus down to 1cm (vs. 5 cm on Olympus) provides immense versatility for tiny subject details.
• Manual focus ability gives sharper results where autofocus might hunt.

Olympus’ digital stabilization helps, but fixed zoom limits framing flexibility in macro scenes.

Night and Astro Photography: Low Light Performance and Exposure Control

Both cameras struggle in low light due to small CCD sensors and modest maximum aperture.

• Olympus supports ISO 1600; Ricoh ISO 3200, but the latter’s noise levels soar at max ISO.
• Slowest shutter speeds differ: Olympus 4s minimum, Ricoh 8s. I found that 8s maximum shutter on Ricoh enables longer night exposures but neither offers bulb mode or advanced astro capabilities.
• Neither supports manual/exposure priority, limiting exposure control.

Video Capabilities: Limited Footage Options

Video is basic on both:

• Max resolution capped at 640x480 at 30 fps - VGA quality by today’s standards.
• Both record Motion JPEG with no advanced codec support.
• No microphone or headphone jacks; video stabilization either digital (Olympus) or none (Ricoh).

For casual home movies or documentation, fine, but no creative video work intended here.

Travel Photography: Versatility Meets Dependability

Olympus:

• Compact enough to stash anywhere.
• Lightweight for extended roam.
• Moderate lens range.
• Strategic digital stabilization.

Ricoh:

• Rugged, waterproof, and sealed against dust.
• Longer zoom and macro combo.
• Larger screen enhances framing.

Battery life is unspecified but both accept removable batteries typical for compacts; Ricoh’s larger body accommodates a beefier battery (DB-60).

Based on my field use:

• Olympus is the better travel companion for urban trips and light hiking.
• Ricoh suits adventures with adverse weather exposure such as rafting or construction sites.

Professional Work: Backup or Specialty Tool?

Neither camera can compete with professional-grade cameras in raw file support, manual modes, or sensor performance.

• No RAW limits postproduction workflows.
• No advanced autofocus or lens interchange.
• No full-weather sealing or shock resistance for Olympus.
• Ricoh offers ruggedness but not the versatility pros demand.

They serve best as affordable backups or specialized niche devices rather than primary professional gear.

Technical Summary and Performance Scores

Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?

• Street and Travel Enthusiasts: Olympus FE-3010 is the clear winner if your priority is lightness, quiet operation, and simplicity for daily shooting. Pocketable size makes it easy to carry.

• Outdoor Adventurers and Macro Shooters: Ricoh G700SE excels with waterproof, rugged construction and exceptional macro reach. Perfect for those working under tough environmental conditions.

• Casual Snapshot Users: Both cameras serve basic needs without advanced features. Olympus is slightly more user-friendly for beginners.

• Professionals as Backup/Secondary Cameras: Neither is ideal but Ricoh’s build quality means it could be a reliable backup in harsh settings compared to Olympus.

Final Thoughts: Honest Assessment for the Informed Buyer

Having tested these cameras extensively, here’s what I conclude:

Olympus FE-3010 Pros:

• Exceptionally lightweight and pocket-friendly.
• Effective digital image stabilization for a point-and-shoot.
• Simple controls and face detection for portraits.
• Affordable price point.

Olympus FE-3010 Cons:

• Limited zoom range and aperture.
• Low-resolution and dim screen.
• No RAW or manual exposure modes.
• Minimal environmental sealing.

Ricoh G700SE Pros:

• Rugged, waterproof, and dust-resistant build.
• Manual focus and excellent macro performance.
• Larger, bright LCD for better framing.
• Longer zoom with wider angle.

Ricoh G700SE Cons:

• Bulkier and heavier.
• No image stabilization.
• No face/eye detection autofocus.
• Basic video and no headphone/mic ports.

Choosing between the Olympus FE-3010 and Ricoh G700SE boils down to your priorities:

• Go with Olympus if you want portability and casual, easy shooting.
• Choose Ricoh for a tough, more versatile tool capable of handling complex environments and macro detail.

Neither camera redefines the ultracompact class, but both hold niche appeal amidst the modern smartphone-centric photography world.

If you want to dive even deeper into sample shots and detailed controls, [feel free to reach out or consult our dedicated user guides]. Meanwhile, happy shooting wherever your photography takes you!

End of Article