Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-3010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-3010 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very close but the FE-3010 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-3010 was launched 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-3010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-3010 scores against the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-3010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-3010 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| FE-3010 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus FE-3010
| GR Digital IV | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 32 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-3010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| FE-3010 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-3010 provides exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-3010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-3010 versus the GR Digital IV.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-3010 and GR Digital IV is 97 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-3010 and GR Digital IV.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-3010 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus FE-3010 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older FE-3010 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Olympus FE-3010 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-3010 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2011-09-15 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 108 grams (0.24 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 390 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $140 | $599 |