Clicky

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
97
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Olympus FE-3010 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus FE-3010
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-3010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-3010 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very close but the FE-3010 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The FE-3010 was launched 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-3010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-3010 scores against the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 FE-3010 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus FE-3010

 GR Digital IV FE-3010 
RevealedSeptember 2011January 2009Fresher by 32 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-3010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 FE-3010 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-3010 provides exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus FE-3010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-3010 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-3010 and GR Digital IV is 97 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-3010 and GR Digital IV.

All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-3010 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus FE-3010 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older FE-3010 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-3010 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
26
includes face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
40
has manual focus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-3010 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
63
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
64
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-3010 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography details
33
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-3010 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
57
weather sealing
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
67
better than average battery pack (390 per charge)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-3010 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography advice
31
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse mode
52
has manual focus
very good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-3010 Vlogging features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging features
28
built in image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detection focus
wide angle not great (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone support
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-3010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-3010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus FE-3010Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus FE-3010 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-01-07 2011-09-15
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 108 grams (0.24 lbs) 190 grams (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB65
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $140 $599