Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus VH-515, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FE-4000 was brought out 4 years prior to the VH-515 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the FE-4000 scores versus the VH-515 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus VH-515
| FE-4000 | VH-515 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus FE-4000
| VH-515 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 37 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus VH-515
| FE-4000 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus VH-515 has measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-4000 versus the VH-515.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and VH-515 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The visual below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and VH-515.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos however you will need to take the age of the cameras into account. The older FE-4000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography information
Olympus VH-515 Portrait photography information
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
provides face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Street photography details
Olympus VH-515 Street photography details
lighter than average (136g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has touch focus
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography factors
Olympus VH-515 Sports photography factors
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography details
Olympus VH-515 Travel photography details
lighter than average (136 grams)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
has touch focus
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography details
Olympus VH-515 Landscape photography details
pretty wide (26mm)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus FE-4000
Vlogging with Olympus VH-515
pretty wide (26mm)
lighter than average (136 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic port
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 pounds) | 152g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $648 |
