Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus FE-4000 versus Panasonic FS42, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is fairly close but the FE-4000 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4000 was introduced 4 months after the FS42 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FE-4000 matches up versus the FS42 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Panasonic FS42
| FE-4000 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus FE-4000
| FS42 | FE-4000 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Panasonic FS42
| FE-4000 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | April 2009 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 provides outside measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 versus Panasonic FS42 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the FS42.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and FS42.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-4000 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus FE-4000 will result in more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-4000 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Otherwise known as | X-925 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136g (0.30 lb) | 132g (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $580 |