Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The FE-4000 was announced 3 years before the WG-2 GPS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-4000 scores against the WG-2 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-2 GPS | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
FE-4000 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 and the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f08b3/f08b3aad92414f4f2124c47a2c64be93ffc2245c" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WG-2 GPS is 95 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6525e/6525ebeb13a0ee6f7a314fb5a7fcbb8474807549" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4000 and WG-2 GPS.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f61ea/f61eab38906a4719b25afd1178547b6625dd95f6" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14b7d/14b7d82968f1d0c7c5833e57bf1cbd991068dc2c" alt="Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 198 gr (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $130 | $300 |