Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-925
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-4000 was launched 6 months after the CX1 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the FE-4000 grades vs the CX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh CX1
| FE-4000 | CX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus FE-4000
| CX1 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX1
| FE-4000 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 | February 2009 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the CX1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and CX1 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The image underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and CX1.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus FE-4000 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Also called as | X-925 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $130 | $299 |