Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus XZ-10, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Tough-3000 was launched 4 years prior to the XZ-10 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Tough-3000 matches up vs the XZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus XZ-10
| Tough-3000 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| XZ-10 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus XZ-10
| Tough-3000 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the XZ-10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and XZ-10 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The pic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and XZ-10.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of images though you really should take the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $428 |
