Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-4000 was revealed 8 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the FE-4000 scores vs the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-50
FE-4000 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus FE-4000
WG-50 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | July 2009 | Fresher by 95 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-50
FE-4000 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 features external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 versus the WG-50.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-50.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Also Known as | X-925 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136g (0.30 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $130 | $280 |