Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Alternative Name is X-925
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The FE-4000 was revealed 8 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the FE-4000 scores vs the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Ricoh WG-50

 FE-4000 WG-50 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus FE-4000

 WG-50 FE-4000 
ReleasedMay 2017July 2009Fresher by 95 months
Focus manually More precise focus

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-50

 FE-4000 WG-50 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 features external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Olympus FE-4000 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 versus the WG-50.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WG-50.

As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography highlights
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
42
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography factors
55
lighter than others (136 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography information
17
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
49
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography factors
62
lighter than others (136 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
no Timelapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.6)
71
environment sealing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus FE-4000
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-50
28
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Timelapse function
48
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (16MP)
environment sealing
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging details
28
fairly wide (26mm)
lighter than others (136 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone socket
33
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
missing mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-4000 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Ricoh WG-50
 Olympus FE-4000Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-4000 Ricoh WG-50
Also Known as X-925 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-07-22 2017-05-24
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in On, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 136g (0.30 lb) 193g (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots One One
Retail cost $130 $280