Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
92 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-4000 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WB50F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the FE-4000 scores against the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung WB50F
| FE-4000 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus FE-4000
| WB50F | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | July 2009 | Fresher by 54 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB50F
| FE-4000 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 against the WB50F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and WB50F.
As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB50F |
| Also called | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lb) | 207 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $180 |