Clicky

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Olympus FE-4000 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Also Known as X-925
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The FE-4000 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WB50F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the FE-4000 scores against the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung WB50F

 FE-4000 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus FE-4000

 WB50F FE-4000 
RevealedJanuary 2014July 2009Fresher by 54 months
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB50F

 FE-4000 WB50F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-4000 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

See the Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-4000 against the WB50F.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and WB50F.

As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB50F to resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older FE-4000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography highlights
20
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
36
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-4000
Street photography with Samsung WB50F
55
lighter than competition in class (136 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Sports photography highlights
17
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
39
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB50F Travel photography factors
61
lighter than competition in class (136 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
69
lighter than competition (207g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography features
27
reasonably wide (26mm)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
47
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4000 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB50F as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (26mm)
lighter than competition in class (136 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
30
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus FE-4000Samsung WB50F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus FE-4000 Samsung WB50F
Also called X-925 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-07-22 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-105mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s -
Max shutter speed 1/2000s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 136 gr (0.30 lb) 207 gr (0.46 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP70A
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $130 $180