Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the E-P1 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and E-P1 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-4030 was revealed 6 months later than the E-P1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-4030 matches up versus the E-P1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus PEN E-P1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-P1
| FE-4030 | E-P1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus FE-4030
| E-P1 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-P1
| FE-4030 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | July 2009 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4030 has got external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P1 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the E-P1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and E-P1 is 95 and 86 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and E-P1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FE-4030 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Olympus FE-4030 will give you more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 4cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146g (0.32 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $130 | $182 |