Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860
95 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4030 was introduced 6 years before the TG-860 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the FE-4030 grades versus the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus TG-860
| FE-4030 | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus FE-4030
| TG-860 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-860
| FE-4030 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 has got outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the FE-4030 compared to the TG-860.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and TG-860 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The visual below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and TG-860.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-860 to render more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older FE-4030 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lb) | 224 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $130 | $279 |
