Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus FE-4030 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The FE-4030 was brought out 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the FE-4030 grades against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FE-4030 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus FE-4030
XZ-2 iHS | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 35 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FE-4030 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 has outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4030 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-4030 against the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da7c4/da7c4c0f1d759cbada8bd51765e49ae2eed21f38" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aec05/aec05ef20d871c3828be851cf81557a62fc03f7f" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FE-4030 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus FE-4030 will deliver more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older FE-4030 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99fea/99fea011abc114ded3ee3a6e05f3a1cbc5722d11" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50ed3/50ed3d66ea112fc1f8e6595bf8356963e711ab84" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $130 | $450 |