Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2fd8/c2fd8cb3ada58200fb69fb61535ed1c18469bce6" alt="Olympus FE-45 front Olympus FE-45 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus FE-45 versus Olympus E-M10, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and E-M10 (16MP) and the FE-45 (1/2.3") and E-M10 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The FE-45 was introduced 6 years before the E-M10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-45 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FE-45 matches up against the E-M10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-45 and Olympus OM-D E-M10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-45 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Olympus E-M10
FE-45 | E-M10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus FE-45
E-M10 | FE-45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 63 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus E-M10
FE-45 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-45 has exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has proportions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-45 versus Olympus E-M10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-45 against the E-M10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f684/2f6846c9b4635ac34abe8e7166b67c09e603e2ab" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and E-M10 is 95 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d7ff/5d7ffcbd9b4aa7d81bd5f605c8cd960f4d01d3c4" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-45 and E-M10.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-45 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M10 will result in more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older FE-45 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56ebd/56ebd856f82d01449806c3d4209e9b65a4bc194d" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e190d/e190d911550cfe1ef1f55007a2d69a1c66bf04f2" alt="Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Olympus FE-45 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-45 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2014-03-18 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) | 396 grams (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $130 | $600 |