Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-45 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-45 was manufactured 5 years before the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-45 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-45 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FE-45 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus FE-45
| TG-2 iHS | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 54 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FE-45 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-45 provides external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-45 against the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and TG-2 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-45 and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-2 iHS to result in more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-45 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-45 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 142 grams (0.31 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $130 | $380 |