Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-45 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-45 was manufactured 5 years before the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-45 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-45 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FE-45 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus FE-45
| TG-2 iHS | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 54 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FE-45 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-45 provides external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-45 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-45 against the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-45 and TG-2 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-45 and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-2 iHS to result in more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-45 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-45 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-45 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 142 grams (0.31 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $130 | $380 |