Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30
93 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
91 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FE-47 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-47 was revealed 5 years before the WG-30 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FE-47 matches up vs the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-47 & Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are provided at Olympus FE-47 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Ricoh WG-30
| FE-47 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus FE-47
| WG-30 | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 57 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-47 and Ricoh WG-30
| FE-47 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-47 has physical measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-47 versus the WG-30.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-47 and WG-30 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-47 and WG-30.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged FE-47 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-47 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus FE-47 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-47 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.80 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $428 |